Many frameworks that assist with web development have come up. If you are an avid web developer, they take the hassle out of your work and enable you to focus on the important stuff.
Bootstrap and W3.CSS are two of the most used front end web frameworks. W3.CSS is a lighter framework, which is a huge advantage. However, Bootstrap works well for more complex applications.
In addition to these standout features, we need to delve deeper into the makeup of these frameworks. Such a discussion will enable you to make the right choice for your development needs.
Usage scenarios for both frameworks are easy to grasp. The reason for this is, in part, because they are front end frameworks.
Integration: W3.CSS vs Bootstrap
You have to integrate W3.CSS into your web pages to use it. The official w3 website provides a link that you can incorporate into your website. With this link, W3.CSS activation takes place, and you can use the framework. The other option is downloading the whole framework from the same site. Here you link your website to the download in your local directory. You can then use the framework offline.
Bootstrap integration is a bit more complicated. First, you have the straight-up option to download all of it like W3.CSS. Bootstrap is, however, quite heavy and could slow down your system. Nevertheless, once you have the file in your directory, you have to link to it at the top of your web pages.
W3.CSS is essentially a straightforward framework. You only work with CSS to create your interfaces. For this reason, it is a light framework that will not slow down your websites.
Bootstrap is an amalgamation of different products for your front end needs. CSS is the main component because you can’t design front ends without CSS.
Responsiveness: W3.CSS vs Bootstrap
Almost all modern front end web frameworks are responsive. Responsiveness is the ability of a website to adapt to all kinds of screens. When you’re designing your website, you create it with the smallest screen in mind. From there, the webpage has to adjust as screen size changes.
W3.CSS is fully responsive; you don’t need to add anything to activate responsiveness. By default, when you use the framework, your websites will be responsive.
Bootstrap is also mobile-first. You have to include a unique tag in the head section of your website to enable the adaptability of your website to different screens.
Both frameworks provide you with pre-made designs to make your web design uncomplicated. You can use these ready-made designs as they are or extend them in various ways.
W3.CSS has an impressive range of templates for free. You can access templates for different types of sites, including food sites, portfolio sites, and even music band sites.
W3.CSS allows you to customize these templates according to your liking. You can, therefore, start with a base template but create from it a unique end product. You can also save these templates for later use or share them at will.
Bootstrap has templates as well though they have a different name. You refer to them as themes. You’ll notice that these pre-made designs in Bootstrap are not free. However, you get a wider range of themes, and they also have new updates regularly. You can find themes for almost any kind of website you wish to build, and you can customize them.
Ease of Use: W3.CSS vs Bootstrap
W3.CSS is a much easier framework to use. The integration involves a single action, and after that, you’re good to go. You will also not have a hard time understanding the technical workings of the framework. Part of this is because it is purely a CSS framework. CSS is among the easiest programming languages you’ll ever learn.
Ultimately it’s a trade-off. You can either choose CSS for more comfortable working or Bootstrap for a more laborious process but a more appealing website.
Both frameworks are free. It would be very unusual for a web framework to have a price since it is merely a tool you use to make your development work more manageable.
Verdict: W3.CSS vs Bootstrap
W3.CSS and Bootstrap are decent frameworks, but they will appeal to different audiences.
W3.CSS should be your ideal choice if you want your websites not to have the burden of carrying chunky frameworks. Because it is purely CSS based, you will not notice any time lags when your websites are loading.
Bootstrap is also ideal if you want a variety of themes. Though you have to pay for them, you’ll appreciate the value you get for your money.